Glossary

Track Changes

Digital revision tracking tools that record insertions, deletions, and comments during the editing process, enabling collaborative workflows.

Last updated

Track changes is a digital editing feature that records every insertion, deletion, and formatting modification made to a document, displaying them as visible markup that can be accepted, rejected, or discussed. Originally popularized by Microsoft Word, track changes functionality is now available across most writing and editing platforms, including Google Docs, Scrivener, and specialized publishing tools. The feature transformed the editorial process by making revision transparent and reversible: every change an editor makes is visible to the author, who can evaluate each modification individually before accepting or rejecting it. This transparency replaced the older model of editors making silent changes to manuscripts, giving authors greater agency over their own text.

In professional publishing, track changes is the backbone of the editorial workflow. A developmental editor might use comments and suggested restructuring, while a copy editor typically makes direct changes with track changes enabled, allowing the author to review every comma placement, word substitution, and grammatical correction. The comment feature enables margin conversations between author and editor, creating a dialogue about contested changes. Major publishing houses like Penguin Random House and HarperCollins have standardized workflows built around track changes, with manuscripts passing through multiple rounds of editing, each tracked and archived. The feature has also enabled the rise of remote freelance editing, since editors and authors can collaborate asynchronously across time zones without ever meeting in person.

To use track changes effectively in your own revision process, establish clear conventions with your collaborators. Decide whether the editor should make direct changes (for copy-editing) or suggest changes via comments (for developmental feedback). When reviewing tracked changes, resist the urge to accept all changes blindly—each modification deserves evaluation, because even skilled editors occasionally introduce errors or alter voice in ways the author would not choose. Conversely, do not reject changes defensively; if an editor has flagged a passage, it likely needs attention even if the specific fix is not quite right. For self-editing, consider using track changes on your own manuscript during revision, as seeing your deletions and additions visually can help you evaluate whether each change improves the text. Save versions at each stage of the editorial process so you can revisit earlier drafts if needed.

Ready to start writing?

Plan, draft, and collaborate — all in one workspace built for writers.

Try Plotiar Free